On Tue, 28 Dec 1999, Hunter Matthews wrote: HM> Basically, nobody is going to use a true logging filesystem these days - HM> the databases themselves do rollback. The other advantage to logging is HM> the part that is also a part of journaling, and journaling is thus more HM> general purpose. [Pleading for mercy, I'm not a heavy DB guy] Slight modification for your statement: "... nobody is going to use a true logging filesystem for databases these days ..." Logging file systems are still VERY useful for general purpose FSes. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: Book never written: "Dog training." by Wille Bite
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Stephen Waters
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Jason Titus
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Seth Vidal
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Jason Titus
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Seth Vidal
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Marc Mutz
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Jason Titus
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Seth Vidal
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Andre Pang
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Hunter Matthews
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Theo Van Dinter
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Adam J. Richter
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Matti Aarnio
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Adam J. Richter
- RE: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Cavanaugh, Craig