> I have tried to get the latest Linux RAID patches to work with the
> ABit BE6-2 onboard HPT366 controller (BIOS ver 1.21) without
> success.  There has been a bit of discussion relating to this on
> this mailing list (as well as the Linux-kernel mailing list) so I
> was hoping this may help someone and answer some of my questions.
> 
I brought this board up running raid1 2.2.14+mingoB1 patch a couple 
of days ago, no problems -- dual Celeron 500's bonnie shows through 
put at about 22megs per second block read and write with a pair of 
seagate barracudas 30.7 gig udma drives on UDMA/66

I had previously applied the linux-ide.2.2.14.20000124.patch so I 
could use this kernel on another system with the promise controller, 
don't know if this makes a difference.

My only question is how do you get this thing to boot with only 
root disks on the HPT366 controller. Lilo says "LIL-"

I've been using a floppy boot disk which is OK, but direct booting 
would be nice.

 Michael



> My first attempt was as per the instructions on the HighPoint
> webpage http://www.highpoint-tech.com/ which if I'm not mistaken is
> to use the following:
> 
> linux 2.2.14           (straight from http://www.kernel.org)
> pre-patch-2.2.15-17
> ide-2.2.15-17.20000405.patch
> raid-2.3.15-A0                (from
> http://people.redhat.com/mingo/raid-patches)
> 
> This resulted with a RAID-0 array of 2 IDE disks (Western Digital
> 102AA) up and running with the ability to read and write from the
> array. However, if I copied a file from one directory to another on
> the RAID0 then the system would lockup and die taking the filesystem
> with it. eg. hda -> md0       = Transfer OK md0 -> hda        = Transfer OK md0
> -> md0        = Lockup and corrupt filesystem
> 
> My 2nd try used a hint from a previous mail on this mailing list
> which used the following:
> 
> linux-2.2.14
> ide.2.2.14.20000111.patch
> raid-2.2.14-B1
> 
> This resulted with a RAID-0 array of 2 IDE disks (WD 102AA) up and
> running without the problem above.  However, on light loads
> everything is fine and works well.  As soon as I have any more than
> a few programs eg. cp, grep etc. accessing the disk at the same time
> I get an error like:
> 
> hdg: timeout waiting for DMA
> 
> which results in a total lockup after what seems like a random
> duration. If I run bonnie (any version) than the lockup is always
> guaranteed during the rewriting stage.
> 
> I have tried all the possible combinations of Master/Slave,
> Master/Master etc on the HPT366 controller but the same problems
> occur. eg. HPT366 1st port o----------------o HDD Master
> o--------------------o HDD Slave
> 
> HPT366 2nd port o----------------o HDD Master o--------------------o
> HDD Slave
> 
> HPT366 1st port o----------------o HDD Master
> HPT366 2nd port o----------------o HDD Master
> 
> I have tried this on RedHat 6.1, 6.2 and Mandrake 7.0-2 and the
> problem still exists (not surpassing since they are similar)
> 
> The hdparm settings in effect when errors occur are:
> multicount    16
> I/O support   32bit
> unmaskirq     Off
> using DMA     On
> keepsettings  Off
> nowerr                Off
> readonly      Off
> read ahead    8
> 
> I have tried all tests on each HDD separately (not in a RAID array)
> and there were no problems. I have also tested the RAID array under
> the standard IDE driver and there were no problems. I have tried all
> tests on the RAID array when DMA is turned off on all drives and
> there were no problems but sloooow (to be expected).
> 
> So it seems that the problem is with the interaction between the
> RAID code and the HPT366 driver code when using DMA?? - is this a
> fair conclusion? Does anyone have any ideas?  
> 
> Is there another known combination of Kernel, IDE and RAID patches
> that work for someone else?
> 
> Should I use different drives?  Are the WD102AA known to be buggy?
> Should I update the HPT366 BIOS to the newer version?  Is this an
> issue? - does Linux use the HPT366 BIOS at all? Should I use a
> better known controller?  Is the HPT366 known to be buggy with its
> use of DMA?
> 
> Is there an organised effort to fix this problem? - if there is,
> what can I help with?
> 
> Thanks in Advance
> 
> Adrian Head
> 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to