> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) [mailto:jsquy...@cisco.com]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Ad IB_MTU_1500|9000 enums.
>
> On Apr 8, 2013, at 6:16 PM, "Hefty, Sean" <sean.he...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > Why can't IB_MTU_1500 = 1500?
>
Sean,
If the IBTA were to release new MTU enumerations which values would you
recommend then?
Ira
>
> It certainly could. Additionally, since Roland was a little concerned about
> the
> "IB" prefix (since 1500 and 9000 are not IBTA-sanctioned MTUs), they could
> have a different prefix -- perhaps RDMA_MTU_1500.
>
> Although I admit that it would be weird to have an enum that contains values
> with different prefixes:
>
> enum ib_mtu {
> IB_MTU_256 = 1,
> IB_MTU_512 = 2,
> IB_MTU_1024 = 3,
> IB_MTU_2048 = 4,
> IB_MTU_4096 = 5,
> RDMA_MTU_1500 = 1500,
> RDMA_MTU_9000 = 9000
> };
>
> --
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquy...@cisco.com
> For corporate legal information go to:
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
