> This seems reasonable, but still concerns me a bit.  The original
> version was flat out wrong because you can't re-arrange any exposed enum
> like this without requiring that all user space apps be recompiled.
> This is especially true because ibv_mtu_enum_to_int is an inline

ib_mtu_enum_to_int() is a kernel function, not user space, so I think we're 
fine here, unless you're concerned about drivers built out of tree.

- Sean
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to