On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 07:49:03PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > > @@ -1979,8 +1985,9 @@ static void ravb_set_delay_mode(struct net_device > > > *ndev) > > > priv->phy_interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID) > > > set |= APSR_DM_RDM; > > > > > > - if (priv->phy_interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID || > > > - priv->phy_interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID) > > > + if ((priv->phy_interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID || > > > + priv->phy_interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID) && > > > + !soc_device_match(ravb_delay_mode_quirk_match)) > > > > But don't we need to error out of the probing as we can't set the delay > > mode > > requested? > > Yes, if we can, we should error out. It just depends on if there are > broken DT blobs out there. We recently had a lot of pain from broken > DT blobs using the at803x PHY and getting RGMII modes wrong. In the > long run, it is best to if DT, but i've no idea how many boards are > affected.
Hi Andrew, I suspect there are such blobs out there and I'm not sure what the fall-out may or may not be.
