Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 11:35:14AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Not true. The original code used 'int irq', and the printf format was
correct as a result.
You changed the code to use 'unsigned int irq' as found in struct
pci_dev, without changing IRQ_FMT as needed.
If you wanted to avoid the regression another way, I suppose patch #1
should update IRQ_FMT to use "%u", and patch #14 should move the "%u"
use to its caller.
What do you think the regression is, exactly?
The *only* difference in how vsnprintf handles %d vs %u is the sign bit.
Because when you change the type, you should change the printf format to
match?
It used to match, before your patchset. Now it doesn't.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
