On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 12:02 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 01:56:59AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 11:45 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 09:32:09PM +0000, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > > > From: Nicholas Bellinger <n...@linux-iscsi.org>
> > > > 
> > > > This patch updates virtscsi_probe() to setup necessary Scsi_Host
> > > > level protection resources. (currently hardcoded to 1)
> > > > 
> > > > It changes virtscsi_add_cmd() to attach outgoing / incoming
> > > > protection SGLs preceeding the data payload, and is using the
> > > > new virtio_scsi_cmd_req_pi->d[oi],pi_niv field to signal
> > > > to signal to vhost/scsi how many prot_sgs to expect.
> > > > 
> > > > v3 changes:
> > > >   - Use VIRTIO_SCSI_F_T10_PI to determine PI or non PI header (Paolo)
> > > > 
> > > > v2 changes:
> > > >   - Make protection buffer come before data buffer (Paolo)
> > > >   - Enable virtio_scsi_cmd_req_pi usage (Paolo)
> > > > 
> > > > Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
> > > > Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
> > > > Cc: Martin K. Petersen <martin.peter...@oracle.com>
> > > > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
> > > > Cc: Hannes Reinecke <h...@suse.de>
> > > > Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sa...@dev.mellanox.co.il>
> > > > Cc: H. Peter Anvin <h...@zytor.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <n...@linux-iscsi.org>
> > > 
> > > OK but we need to document the new interface in the spec
> > > (and incidentially, this will be useful to verify the assumptions
> > > made here and on the host side).
> > > Could you please submit this proposal to the OASIS Virtio TC
> > > for inclusion into the next spec draft?
> > > Ideally as a patch against the tex source, but a prose
> > > description would do as well.
> > 
> > Most certainly.  Please give me a bit to follow up on this, as the next
> > couple of days are going to be hellishly busy..
> > 
> > > The TC meets on a bi-weekly basis, we should be able to ratify
> > > this quickly.
> > > 
> > 
> > Aside from that, please consider ACK'ing the vhost specific changes so
> > these can make it into v3.15-rc1 code.
> > 
> > --nab
> > 
> 
> Hmm but what if the TC wants to change the interface somewhat?

I don't have a objection to changing the interface post-merge.

> I guess we'll still be able to fix it after the merge window -
> (or worst case, revert the change) is this what you are suggesting?
> 

Yes, but I would think that it is actually fixable.  ;)

Otherwise, a v3.16 merge is an option as well.  It's really your +
Paolo's call here. 

--nab

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to