Craig, remember that Linux is a multitasking kernel with no (generic) real time capabilities. Your process frequently gets interrupted for an unspecified amount of time. If a (serial) IRQ occurs then, the signal has to be memorized and your process gets aware of it when scheduled the next time. No real difference to polling, I think. If you want a single interrupt driven process, have a look at RTLinux or any other real time Linux. Hth, Michael P.S. Hope this is correct. I'm not a kernel guru. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- modem control line checking - is polling the only way? Craig Schlenter
- Re: modem control line checking - is polling the onl... Craig Schlenter
- Re: modem control line checking - is polling the... Michael Harig
- Re: modem control line checking - is polling... Craig Schlenter
- Re: modem control line checking - is pol... Michael Harig
- Re: modem control line checking - i... Craig Schlenter
- Re: modem control line checking - is pol... Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: modem control line checking - i... Craig Schlenter
- Re: modem control line checking - is polling the... Craig Schlenter
- Re: modem control line checking - is polling... Tom Glass
- Re: modem control line checking - is pol... Craig Schlenter
- Re: modem control line checking - is polling the onl... Vern Hoxie
- Re: modem control line checking - is polling the... Craig Schlenter