Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 12:13:01 +0200
From: Craig Schlenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Entirely correct AFAIK. I don't have seriously hard deadlines to
meet timing-wise in my software so I don't need RTLinux. My objection
to polling is that it's not an elegant way to solve the problem of
detecting a change in the control lines.
Is the linux-serial archived anywhere? It seems just last week I
answered the question about using TIOCMIWAIT to allow you a process to
sleep until a specified set of control lines change. Unfortunately, I
can't find my posting on the subject, and I don't have time now to
rewrite it just now.
This is something that probably should get added to the Serial
FAQ/HOWTO, since it seems to come up more and often.
- Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- modem control line checking - is polling the only way? Craig Schlenter
- Re: modem control line checking - is polling the onl... Craig Schlenter
- Re: modem control line checking - is polling the... Michael Harig
- Re: modem control line checking - is polling... Craig Schlenter
- Re: modem control line checking - is pol... Michael Harig
- Re: modem control line checking - i... Craig Schlenter
- Re: modem control line checking - is pol... Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: modem control line checking - i... Craig Schlenter
- Re: modem control line checking - is polling the... Craig Schlenter
- Re: modem control line checking - is polling... Tom Glass
- Re: modem control line checking - is pol... Craig Schlenter
- Re: modem control line checking - is polling the onl... Vern Hoxie
- Re: modem control line checking - is polling the... Craig Schlenter
- Re: modem control line checking - is polling the onl... Vern Hoxie
- Re: modem control line checking - is polling the... Theodore Y. Ts'o
