On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 03:01:58PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > >In short, this is not about "power supply" but VBUS detection. IIRC, > >if no VBUS detection method is provided, the phy driver just waits a > >period of time after an ID pin change and then considers VBUS invalid. > > Right, but that is a hack for boards with no / broken vbus detection > (or vbus control), we really want to use vbus-det where available, > so I agree that a TODO comment here would be good.
What's so special in our SoCs that makes that we can't just rely on the ID pin ? (which seems to be working just fine here) Other SoCs don't need to rely on such a hack as well. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
