On Mon, Jun 04, 2001, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > So I'm not quite sure that urb->lock can really disappear.
> > > Though I'd agree that it's one of several chunks of urb data
> > > that aren't clearly enough specified.
> > 
> > He specifically said usb-uhci and nothing about hcd or any other
> > drivers.
> 
> OK, but I'll explicitly say that many of the URB data fields
> aren't documented well enough, and that's one of them! :)

Agreed.

> In fact I've been tempted to submit a patch that'll rearrange
> the fields in the URB data structure so that the ones which
> are reserved to the HCD are split out from the others, and
> so they all get some decent docs.  Not top on the priority
> list, but I think it'd be a Good Thing.

We can look at this during 2.5, definately.

JE


_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to