David Brownell wrote:

>Yes, please.  So the patch from xavyer was OK except
>the version + description string should be info() not dbg () ...
>that's a simple edit to his patch.
>
Hmm, why not description + version?  It seems a bit easier to read, 
which translates to less-confusing-to-users, which is good for everyone.

Imagine the (admittedly contrived) example of: "v3.3:v.34 softmodem 
driver" :)

-- 
Mark McClelland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to