And that would be a fair answer. But: (a) If that's the case, I'd like to _know_ it (instead of your guess). (b) I'd also like to know that he _really_ intends to take the next few steps.
Other than that, the patch looks fine. But I'd really hate to introduce a couple of new files only to have them removed later... so we should think about where this is all going to end up _ahead_of_time_. Matt On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 01:03:33PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 12:58:02PM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote: > > Andries -- > > > > I don't mean to sound as if you're inventing functions... I just mean that, > > if you're going to reduce 5 copies to 2, why not reduce 5 copies to one > > instead? > > > > I don't quite understand your reasoning for not completing the code > > consolidation. > > He's moving in tiny steps? > > > greg k-h > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > _______________________________________________ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver You were using cheat codes too. You guys suck. -- Greg to General Studebaker User Friendly, 12/16/1997
msg06662/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
