[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote > > You ask: what silly code - why write things that way? > I agree entirely. But this silly code occurred five times, > and after the patch it occurs once. That is a much better > starting point if one wants to improve this code.
Like for example, it's now practical to make that common code use bulk queuing to get rid of the between-request latency that wastes bandwidth ... and all the storage devices will be faster! Someone once said that even for USB 1.1 speeds, that's a win of 5%-10%. For USB 2.0 it's quite a bit more than that (more like 50%-100%). - Dave _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
