[linux-usb-devel] Re: further proposed small API change

[David Brownell]

Oliver Neukum wrote:

In addition there are strategic thoughts. Doing this change allows (although
I think that it's 2.7 stuff) us to handle more of disconnect in usbcore.
We can under these condition link all URBs of a device and walk the list
if we detect a disconnect. If a driver allocates all URBs in probe()
,as many do, handling disconnect() becomes as easy as usbcore can make it.

Say what?

We can already walk all the _submitted_ urbs in usbcore, and in fact
there's code in "hcd.c" to do that in case of catastrophe.

And for non-submitted urbs there's no point keeping records in usbcore.





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: A Thawte Code Signing Certificate is essential in establishing user confidence by providing assurance of authenticity and code integrity. Download our Free Code Signing guide:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0028en
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel