Am Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2003 01:52 schrieb David Brownell:
> >> - 1..N TDs ... dependant on the specific buffer passed later,
> >> except (usually) for ISO (where i == n)
> >
> > What prevents you from allocating a reasonable number in the general case
> > and as many as you may need in the iso case?
>
> What, and have _two_ code paths to debug/stabilize in the
> hairy hardware-specific logic ... one where you guessed
> right, and one where you guessed wrong?
Very good point.
So I'll get a 2.0 device and after that I'll code something and
do benchmarks. After 2.7.0 we can discuss this again.
OK ?
Regards
Oliver
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: A Thawte Code Signing Certificate
is essential in establishing user confidence by providing assurance of
authenticity and code integrity. Download our Free Code Signing guide:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0028en
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
