Am Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2003 01:43 schrieb David Brownell:
> Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > In addition there are strategic thoughts. Doing this change allows
> > (although I think that it's 2.7 stuff) us to handle more of disconnect in
> > usbcore. We can under these condition link all URBs of a device and walk
> > the list if we detect a disconnect. If a driver allocates all URBs in
> > probe() ,as many do, handling disconnect() becomes as easy as usbcore can
> > make it.
>
> Say what?
>
> We can already walk all the _submitted_ urbs in usbcore, and in fact
> there's code in "hcd.c" to do that in case of catastrophe.
>
> And for non-submitted urbs there's no point keeping records in usbcore.
But there is. We can make sure nobody submits them. The goal is to make
the API as idiot proof as we can, without compromising other goals.
Regards
Oliver
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: A Thawte Code Signing Certificate
is essential in establishing user confidence by providing assurance of
authenticity and code integrity. Download our Free Code Signing guide:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0028en
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
