Alan Stern wrote: <snip> > Looking through the dmesg output isn't as useful as I had hoped. There > are other differences between 2.4 and 2.6 that obscure the problem we're > trying to solve. > > Don't be too surprised that something works under 2.4 and fails under 2.6! > > There have been a lot of changes. Sometimes a change that's intended to > improve performance can actually hurt, when running with hardware that > won't support the extra speed. There are other differences too, not just > in the drivers. The commands send by the two kernels aren't queued in the
Would it help you knowing, that i tested an other usb 2.0 hard disk enclosure, that did work with kernel 2.6? But again, both work good with kernel 2.4.22. > same way, for example. > > I think David will be able to send some suggestions for things to try that > > will either fix your problem or at least narrow it down. > > Alan Stern OK, many thanks! regards, hampel -- NEU F�R ALLE - GMX MediaCenter - f�r Fotos, Musik, Dateien... Fotoalbum, File Sharing, MMS, Multimedia-Gru�, GMX FotoService Jetzt kostenlos anmelden unter http://www.gmx.net +++ GMX - die erste Adresse f�r Mail, Message, More! +++ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
