David Brownell wrote: > Yeouch! Microsoft's EHCI drivers? From what OS version? > Identical hardware in both cases?
So i did the test: Hardware: USB 2.0 storage (supporting max sectors = 240) connected to usb extension PCI card. Tested Partition: Partition 1 (18GB), FAT32 Filesize: 799MB 1: Windows 2000 with driver for pci card from vendor, driver for usb storage from microsoft. 2: Linux 2.6.0-test9 usb storage max sectors = 240 Perhaps the result times aren't so accurate, but i know, there was a big difference. ---- Now i tested again with my other usb 2.0 storage but with a sector count of only 128 and the benchmark results don't differ so much as before: Windows 2000: 1 test: 60 sec, 2 test: 65 sec. Linux: 1 test : 57 sec, sync, 2 test: 57 sec. ---- I made my first benchmark with an usb storage supporting 240 sectors, i guess that was the reason for being much faster than windows, or this was *really* good hardware and my other usb storage is buggy. My second benchmark was made with max sectors = 120, but this is faster than windows 2000 yet:-) > Scarey though, > given how many vendor only test against Windows and who may > accordingly be shipping more such bugs in their products. Yes, i guess it's a hardware bug:-( regards, hampel ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
