Hi again,
> > If I understand it well, this changes the previous default behaviour;
> > intf->cur_altsetting will be intf->altsetting[0], like before, only if
> > there's no intf->altsetting[i].desc.bAlternateSetting == 0.
>
> That's right. However, the oops you saw shouldn't happen so long as
> intf->cur_altsetting points to something valid. I got the impression
that
> in the cdc-acm probe routine maybe it was a null pointer.
Additionally, there's still a reference to altsetting[0] in cdc-acm.c (in
acm_ctrl_msg()), I don't know if it's intentional or should have been
converted from
acm->control->altsetting[0].desc.bInterfaceNumber
to
acm->control->cur_altsetting.desc.bInterfaceNumber
?
--
Colin
This message represents the official view of the voices
in my head.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
