On Sat, 7 Jan 2006 23:12:08 +0100, Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't argue personal taste. If you have better ideas about implementing > waiting helpers, implement them and I'll use them. Until then what but > the more or less canonical ways do you expect me to use? Compared to > the old code, they _are_ an improvement. Using wait_for_event is never an improvement. It's just a retarded API, which allows you to save lines-of-code count at expense of being opaque and conflicting with proper locking. -- Pete ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
