Yeah, not a high priority, I agree. In fact, I was only asking to see if you controlled both numbers, then hopefully they could be the same. Since you don't control both of them, it fell even lower in my priority. ~Randy ___________________________________________________ |Randy Dunlap Intel Corp., DAL Sr. SW Engr.| |randy.dunlap.at.intel.com 503-696-2055| |NOTE: Any views presented here are mine alone | |and may not represent the views of my employer. | |_________________________________________________| > -----Original Message----- > From: Matthew Dharm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2000 11:13 PM > To: Randy Dunlap > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [linux-usb] Re: PATCH: usb-storage > > > The number before the / is the number from the usb-storage > point of view, > assigned as a monotonically increasing number. > > The number after the / is the SCSI host number. The SCSI layer > controlls this, not me. > > If the numbers are different for you, then it's because > you've got another > SCSI driver loaded, or perhaps ide-scsi emulation. > > I could see about making the numbers the same... I'm not sure > how tricky > that would be... we'll see when I feel better, but you can > understand if > this isn't on the top of my priority list. Tho it probably > would be nice > to have them be the same... of course, before I change this > the numbers > weren't the same either. > > Matt Dharm > > On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > Matt, > > > > Regarding one item in this patch, > > > > [snip] > > > > (o) Changed the names of the /proc/scsi/ entry and the > control thread to > > > > be more descriptive and easier to read. > > > > With 3 USB storage devices, I have directories in proc/scsi named > > usb-storage-0, usb-storage-1, and usb-storage-2. > > The single file in each one of those directories is named > > 1, 2, and 3 respectively. That is, > > usb-storage-0/1 > > usb-storage-1/2 > > usb-storage-2/3 > > > > Is this by design? Do you control this or does the SCSI > layer control > > part of it? > > > > I don't mind beginning at 0, but couldn't the numbers > before and after > > the '/' be the same? > > > > ~Randy > > > > -- > Matthew Dharm Home: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Engineer, Qualcomm, Inc. Work: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > A: The most ironic oxymoron wins ... > DP: "Microsoft Works" > A: Uh, okay, you win. > -- A.J. & Dust Puppy > User Friendly, 1/18/1998 > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
