Bill, Nacho,
The patch could make sense to me if USB didn't
work at all, so that "usb_control/bulk_msg: timeout"
happened all of the time. This would be if UHCI
was assigned the incorrect Interrupt.
However, I'm pretty sure that some of us (including
me) see this message just _occasionally_, not all
of the time.
Which of these cases is this patch (trying to) solve?
~Randy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Maidment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2000 3:06 PM
> To: Jose Ignacio Gijon Soriano
> Cc: linux-usb mailing list
> Subject: Re: [linux-usb] usb_control/bulk_msg: timeout
>
>
> At 08:10 am 27/04/00, Bill Maidment wrote:
> Thanks I'll try that today. (BTW my USB IRQ is
> allocated dynamically, but
> it nearly always ends up as IRQ 11, so hopefully that
> will work most of
> the time.)
>
> Ooops. I got confused with PCI and USB IRQs. I used your
> patch and I'm cooking with gas.
>
> Everything works fine. Thanks very much.
>
> ==================================================================
> Bill Maidment
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
