Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated)t

[Alan Cox]

> Why would usbdevfs (with the custom VFS) have any less race conditions than
> devfs?

Please read my original message again. I have _ZERO_ problems with usbdevfs
being part of devfs. I've said that twice now but its apparently not going
in.

> In fact, with the extra eyes, statistics say there should be less.

Indeed

> However, I'm intested to see how you intend to make this work without
> unnecessarily reinventing an already existing system and without reducing
> functionality.

Once you have insert/remove events being passed to user space you can handle
it in user space for the stuff that matters. Im not trying to duplicate
the devfs side. USB has to be usable without devfs. USB doesnt have to
be as good without devfs.

Alan



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]