> Yes, but that extends the already "broken" API. Some people want it changed, > and I can see their point of view. Using ioctl() for everything is ugly. You only need one ioctl call to do the selection. After that its precisely as your device/endpoint is. > > I'd like to keep minimal baggage but encourage people to do it the right > > way. The single ioctl then the same API is as close as I can see to avoiding > > the two API problem > > If you want to keep usbdevfs only for 2.2, that could be a solution. Maybe yes. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated)t Alan Cox
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated)t Johannes Erdfelt
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated)t Alan Cox
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated)t Johannes Erdfelt
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated)t Alan Cox
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated)t Johannes Erdfelt
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated)t Alan Cox
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated)t Johannes Erdfelt
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated)t Alan Cox
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated)t Johannes Erdfelt
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated)t Alan Cox
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated)t Johannes Erdfelt
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated)t Alan Cox
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated)t Johannes Erdfelt
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated)t Alan Cox
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated)t Johan Verrept
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated)t Alan Cox
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated)t Tom Rini
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated)t Alan Cox
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated)t Tom Rini
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated)t Alan Cox
