Keith Clayton wrote:
>
> Interesting . . hadn't thought about that. I can't help but wonder if
> this wouldn't make more sense as a plan for transition to devfs. Little
> setup from the user end. From the device end, look first to /devfs then
> fall back to /dev Provides time to transition code,scripts,etc to the new
> way of doing things. Maybe this needs to be suggested further up the food
> chain ;-) My objections are simply one of setup time and time spent
> fixing whatever breaks while I learn how it works.
FWIW, during my 2 weeks I spent on the Linux Kernel mailing list, I
witnessed a devfs-related flame war that suggested that mounting devfs
on /dev was a idea that many had objected to. It still mounts on dev,
though, so I imagine this is to be the offical home for devfs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
