On Sun, 9 Jul 2000, Stephen J. Gowdy wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Jul 2000, Bruno Pires Marinho wrote:
>
> > I have a supramax, kernel 2.4.0-test1, ppp-2.4.0b2, redhat 6.2 and wvdial
> > 1.41.
>
> Interesting. If you look on the Supported Device page it claims the
> SupraMax isn't an acm device. However, that one has a different device
> ID. Have they changed the device but kept the same name?
But if I can talk to the modem using minicom (giving AT commands
works fine) doesn't it mean it's all working fine? All I want to know is
the 8-bit not clean is related to USB or not?
> > I: If#= 1 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=ff Prot=ff Driver=(none)
But the modem seems to have two configurations and the second has comm and
data with acm. Isn't that enought?
Another thing I got mistake my modem his the one named Supramaz with a
label with (SUP) 2890.
> This looks similar to what happens with their Creative ModemBlaster USB
> according to the Supported Device page. Perhaps you should contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] who has one.
He also had a 8-bit not clean problem?
Bruno Pires Marinho
http://mega.ist.utl.pt/~bapm/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
