There are a variety of CC licences. Happily, there's also an on-line
chooser, to walk you through the things that you need to think about:
http://creativecommons.org/license/
It's a bit like Easy urpmi for licences.
Give it a go, Jim.
Michael JasonSmith wrote:
On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 16:17, Jim Cheetham wrote:
I've been thinking about the CLUG wiki, and decided that I should have
made a decision about the licensing model before anyone contributed. I
think the examples of others has convinced me that the CC license is
appropriate, however I haven't actually done any real research on the
alternatives.
Can I have some opinions, please?
Wikipedia uses the GFDL, FWIW. I suggest others look at the alternatives
at Creative Commons to see what suits there taste ;)
=======================================================================
This email, including any attachments, is only for the intended
addressee. It is subject to copyright, is confidential and may be
the subject of legal or other privilege, none of which is waived or
lost by reason of this transmission.
If the receiver is not the intended addressee, please accept our
apologies, notify us by return, delete all copies and perform no
other act on the email.
Unfortunately, we cannot warrant that the email has not been
altered or corrupted during transmission.
=======================================================================
