On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 17:37, Douglas Royds wrote:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/I personally like the share-alike aspect of the above licence; I suspect more submitters would be happy with http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ which just requires that the original author is given attribution.
In a wiki environment, as I see it, there is no way to guarantee to preserve attribution easily. Changes are logged, but contributors might be anonymous. So the licenses/by* are probably not appropriate ... and I can't see anything like an nc-sa one ...
