On Wednesday 03 May 2006 13:33, Nick Rout wrote: > On Wed, 03 May 2006 12:42:51 +1200 > > Christopher Sawtell wrote: > > On Wednesday 03 May 2006 11:15, Nick Rout wrote: > > > The last message you posted revealed that you hadn't followed the > > > advice you had been given, which is probably the most frustrating > > > part. > > > > > > On Wed, 03 May 2006 02:57:45 +1200 Bernard wrote: > > > > Sorry no feedback given because it is not working, will try later, > > > > finding it quite hard work. > > > > wadr. 25 posts to this thread indicate you should consider an > > alternative to Linux. For example. > > > > http://www.apple.com/macmini/ > > > > The older G4 processor ones also run Linux beautifully. > > > > -- > > CS > > I think a few of us have been a little frustrated at helping Bernard, > but remember he is a newbie, and we have encouraged him to make a start > and have a go. I think telling him after a week or two that "this OS is > not for you, piss off to MacLand" is a bit off. As Bernard has reminded > me, we all started somewhere. Lets all give him a break, that includes > me! "this OS is not for you, piss off to MacLand" Your words _NOT_ mine,
Suggesting an alternative is very different. -- CS
