On Mon, 18 Mar 2002 19:00:48 -0500 Michael Scottaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Mar 2002 18:42:54 -0500
> Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled in frustration:
>
> >
> >Kernel 2.5.7 source was posted today.
> ============================
> Sheer curiosity:
> Does anyone know if the next stable kernel will be 2.6.x or 3.0.x??
> <shrug>
>
I've had 2.5.6 running on a couple of laptops since the source was posted.
No problems other than not being able to use xconfig. So far, 2.5.7 has
presented a flawless compile run, using gcc 3.0.4 and... well... it's
working well so far.
Personally... having multiple version branches of the linux kernel makes
no sense to me.
--
*************************************************************************
***** Registered Linux User Number 185956
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&safe=off&group=linux
7:01pm up 6 days, 1:22, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.