On Tuesday 14 May 2002 11:50, Collins wrote: > On Tue, 14 May 2002 11:38:34 +1000 Keith Antoine > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Monday 13 May 2002 14:02, Tony Alfrey wrote: > > > On Sunday 12 May 2002 08:01 pm,dep wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > > > > a modern distribution based on 2.4, with > > > > everything simply updated to newer stuff. > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > Isn't that what 3.1 was supposed to be? > > > > It was! but did not turn out that way. > > My crumbly bain cells seem to remember that I liked 3.1 Beta pretty > well, but about that time I discovered several other distros that > worked equally well, so I never bellied up to the bar for 3.1 released > version.
Well I did and was more than disappointed. As far as i was concerned it was no where near as friendly as LTP itself, also it was ancient in the suuplied programs. I had to get to and update a great deal just to ge a decent compile on the latest kernel. Kde was far behind etc. nuff said. -- Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'skippy' 18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161 Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
