On Wed, 22 May 2002, Tim Wunder wrote: > On 5/22/2002 9:13 AM, someone claiming to be Roger Oberholtzer wrote: > > Since xcdroast works, I would imagine that cdrecord itself has proper > > permissions. Still, I have to ask... > > > > Mine are: > > > > -r-sr-sr-x 1 root root 185948 Dec 13 13:55 /usr/bin/cdrecord > > > > -rws--x--- 1 root xcdwrite 265232 Apr 29 22:50 /usr/local/bin/cdrecord
That's not the same as what Roger posted. Not even close. You can't execute a file that you can't read. > > > I had to do a 'chmod +s' myself. I don't care what the packages claim. > > It don't work for me without this. > > > > I'm a member of the xcdrwite group, sufficient for executing cdrecord with the >perm's it has. Not when you can't read it. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
