Is there a standard? If so, what is it? On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:33:29 -0500(EST) Net Llama! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think its also worthwhile to clarify that gphoto is not the > 'standard' for controlling digitial cameras. Thus, looking at its > compatibility list you're not going to get a full picture of which > cameras can perform the operations Roger listed below. > > On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Roger Oberholtzer wrote: > > > Through all this I think one needs to define what how they want to > > access the camera: > > > > - Simply get the images > > > > - USB > > > > - some sort of smart media > > > > - Control the camera > > > > - just to get images off of it > > > > - manipulate settings and get pictures > > > > - GUI or command line > > > > Most cameras will do some of these, some will do all. So, to say a > > camera works is a bit incomplete. > > > > The gphoto site maintain a list of the cameras that work with the > > two version of their library (gphoto and gphoto2). Too bad the nice > > gphoto GUI only works with the original gphoto lib, which supports > > far fewer cameras. The gphoto2 library is limited to a command line > > app. I have never gotten gphoto2 to work in konqueror, which has a > > module for this. > > > > -- > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Lonni J Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> > http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
msg08481/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
