On Sunday 03 August 2003 4:34 am, someone claiming to be Keith Antoine wrote: > On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 09:11 am, Net Llama! wrote: > > On 08/02/03 15:58, Keith Antoine wrote: > > > At the risk of being boring and getting back to kernel compile: I do an > > > rpm -q gtk+, only to get told its not installed. Yet I did install the > > > package, so I tried for about the third time, but in command mode I > > > rpm -ihv --nodeps --force gtk+2.0xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.rpm after > > > installing it obce agin tells me its not installed and locate cannot
"it"? What is telling you that gtk+ is not installed. rpm? Well, that's because the package is called gtk+2.0, not gtk+. Try rpm -q gtk+2.0. > > > find any of its libs etc either. Is it me or Mandrake ? FWIW, locate will only find new files after it's database hase been updated via updatedb, but you knew that... > > > > A bit of each :) > > > > try: > > rpm -qa | grep gtk+ > > Right, this is the result: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] kantoine]# rpm -qa | grep gtk+ > gtk+mdk-0.1.6-14mdk > libgtk+1.2-1.2.10-32mdk > libgtk+mdk0.1_6-0.1.6-14mdk > libgtk+-x11-2.0_0-2.2.2-4mdk > libgtk+-x11-2.0_0-devel-2.2.1-2mdk > gtk+2.0-2.2.2-4mdk > libgtk+2.0_0-devel-2.2.1-2mdk > libgtk+1.2-devel-1.2.10-32mdk > libgtk+mdk0.1_6-devel-0.1.6-14mdk > libgtk+2.0_0-devel-2.2.2-4mdk > libgtk+2.0_0-2.2.2-4mdk You seem to have two versions of libgtk+2.0_0-devel installed. Don't know if that matters, but I'd try removing the two and installing only one. HTH, Tim -- RedHat 8.0 Kernel 2.4.20-18.8, KDE 3.1.CVS, Xfree86 4.2.1 10:20am up 41 days, 11:13, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.05, 0.06 Help! I'm addicted to Klickety! _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
