On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 08:06:47 -0600 Michael Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The first couple of reviews of Fedora were pretty fawning, but others > are starting to show up. Here's an example: > > http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=5111 > > Gives the impression that Fedora needed more time in the oven. > > Which isn't fatal. RH9 works great and it's no hardship to stick with it > for a while. > If my memory serves me correctly, fedora is using the same philosophy that RH used in the past. RH releases (at least until very recently) have always needed more time in the oven. This is one reason I prefer the gentoo model - incremental releases (that usually aren't too painful) over a long period. Unlike the RH approach, gentoo doesn't mark a new compiler release as stable for common use until most all packages work with the new compiler. -- Collins Richey - Denver Area if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for. _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
