Here are mind. I seem more permissive on 
/home/httpd
drwxr-xr-x   6 root     root         1024 Jul  8  2000 httpd 
drwxr-xr-x   6 root     root         1024 Aug 25 22:55 html 
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root          427 Aug 25 22:55 index.html  
I don't know anything about your router. Does it do IP masquerade? If not,
you won't be able to access those 192 numbers, methinks. Use tcpdump to see
what sort of traffic you have.
I have been on @HOME for over a year, and run a web page just for fun. I
have never heard a word from @HOME. They scan port 119 for news servers, but
that is all. Now even with the worms (3) aimed at port 80 have they taken a
single bit of action. 
> The permissions on my public_html directory are drwxr-xr-x
> The permissions on my main.htm page in the public_html directory are (were) 
> -rw-r--r--
> My home directory is rwx--x--x
> Should the html pages have executable permission in order for the world to 
> have access? I executed 'chmod +x' on the files and I can access the page 
> from my son's PC @ 192.168.1.5, but I can't test it from the outside world.
> 
> Thanks, 
> Tim
> 
> _______________________________________________
> http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
>->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
_______________________________________________
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

Reply via email to