Perhaps i should have worded it a bit differently. You are correct, i meant to say that there aren't any new features in 2.4.x, which is the way it should be.
--- Myles Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Net Llama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > From the release notes, it looks to me that most of the changes are > > *alot* of Alan Cox merges and other assorted stupid bug fixes. Not > > much > > in the way of new features (as it should be). > > ...but I thought new features were introduced in the devel series > (2.1.x, 2.3.x, 2.5.x) and only patches and fixes went into the stable > series (2.2.x, 2.4.x, 2.6.x). or have I got that wrong? Version > level=2, > Release level=4, Patch level=x > > just wondering... ===== ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux FAQ & Step-by-step help: http://netllama.ipfox.com . __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. http://personals.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
