On Saturday 27 October 2001 10:06 am, you sent an epistle: > from Keith Antoine: > > [...] > > " I read somewhere were it was said that 01 and 11 were broken and 12 etc > were " ok. > > iirc 2.4.11 shows up at kernel.org (I think) as 2.4.11-dont use or similar.
Damd I meant 10 not 01, thick finger, but then I cannot type. > 2.4.12-ac3 (patched) resulted in a couple of boot errors (re my 8139 card) > going away. > > > I've seen some comments to the effect that the Alan Cox patches are > seen, at the moment, as the more stable series. I use 8 at the moment and trying 13. -- ------------------------------------------------------------- To those who have been in harms way, to those that have made the sacrifice in humanities name. At the going down of the sun and in the morning I shall remember them. ------------------------------------------------------------- Keith Antoine aka "skippy" 18 Arkana St The Gap Queensland 4061 Australia PH 16 7 33002161 Retired Geriatric and Sometime Electronics Engineer : Knowall _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
