--- Mike Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > FWIW, i've successfully built & booted every kernel since 2.4.3. > Some > > have turned out to be duds, but they did boot. Also, i'll note that > > running any 2.4.x kernel less than 2.2.12 is a very bad idea, as > they > > have known root exploits. > > > > I'm currently running 2.4.12 & 2.4.13 on my boxes. > > > erk! There I was thinking 2.4.10 would be pretty close to the bleeding > edge > and #13 is there already!
Yea, #13 popped out last week. > > What gives with maintstream kernels these days? It seems everything > put out > so far should have been called 2.5.x for the amount of problems each > one has > caused. Quite honestly, i haven't had much of a problem with the 2.4.x tree. There were some problems with 2.4.7 & 2.4.8 but other than those, every single kernel has been rock solid for me. ===== ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux FAQ & Step-by-step help: http://netllama.ipfox.com . __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. http://personals.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
