That thought had occured to me, however i don't want to break rpm worse by upgrading to 4.x, and ending up with an unusable rpm database.
Have you actually performed this upgrade? I don't really want to be a guinea pig on this. rpm is broken badly enough right now, making it worse won't help me any. --- Declan Moriarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You want ideas? I had one! > > Aren't they up to rpm 4.x? There was a lot of hassle when that > happened, > because rpms from 4.x could not be opened with 3.x, so there is some > incompatibility. People with rpm 3.x couldn't update their systems. > Get rpm > 4 - it works fine on 3.x rpms ===== ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step help: http://netllama.ipfox.com . __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
