You do know that Netscape-6.x is the same engine code as Mozilla, right? --- Joel Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, you have to use something to browse with. I have been using > opera, > which works pretty good and is fast. Mozilla came on my RH 7.2 box and > it > was OK but I didn't see any great reason to use it over opera, which > was > faster. I just downloaded netscape 6.2. It seems to be a polished > product. > No relation to 6.0! If I can get pluggins to work right, which do > better > with plugger 4.0 so far, and I can get it to do email, it will be as > good > as netscape 4.78! I call that progress! > Joel > . On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 07:47:40AM -0800, Net Llama wrote: > > > > --- Joel Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Does anyone have experience with Plugger 4.0 for netscape 6.2? > > > (I am going to get pluggins working or else...) > > > > Is there a reason why you're insistant on using Netscape 6.2? > Mozilla > > is basically the same thing, only alot more stable, and far easier > to > > work with (IMO). I've not had any trouble getting plugins working > in Mozilla.
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
