Tomohiro KUBOTA writes: > We can use Japanese without ISO-2022 support ... > I want a few infrastructure softwares such as XTerm to support it > (so that ISO-2022-enabled software can run on them) If you say Japanese terminals are usable without ISO-2022 support, why do you want XTerm to support ISO-2022? This would only lead to more Japanese software that does special hacks for supporting this old ISO-2022. It'd be better if software from Japanese authors would use standard APIs (mb/wc etc.), so it can be more useful outside Japan. Take for example w3m, a superb text mode browser. It has special options for JIS, Shift_JIS, EUC-JP, but nothing which works with all encodings. Bruno - Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
- Re: filename encoding (was: ISO-2022) Tomohiro KUBOTA
- Re: filename encoding (was: ISO-2022) David Starner
- Re: filename encoding (was: ISO-2022) Henry Spencer
- Re: filename encoding (was: ISO-2022) Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
- Re: filename encoding (was: ISO-2022) Harald Alvestrand
- Re: filename encoding (was: ISO-2022) Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
- Re: filename encoding (was: ISO-2022) David Starner
- ISO-2022 (Re: filename encoding (was: ISO-2022)) Tomohiro KUBOTA
- Re: ISO-2022 Markus Kuhn
- Re: ISO-2022 Tomohiro KUBOTA
- XTerm and ISO-2022 Bruno Haible
- XTerm and ISO-2022 Tomohiro KUBOTA
- Re: XTerm and ISO-2022 Robert Brady
- Re: XTerm and ISO-2022 Tomohiro KUBOTA
- Re: XTerm and ISO-2022 Robert Brady
- Re: XTerm and ISO-2022 David Starner
- Re: XTerm and ISO-2022 Tomohiro KUBOTA
- Re: XTerm and ISO-2022 Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: XTerm and ISO-2022 Kiyokazu SUTO
- Re: ISO-2022 (Re: xterm) Pierpaolo BERNARDI
- Re: ISO-2022 (Re: xterm) Tomohiro KUBOTA