"Eli Zaretskii" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Emacs cannot use a pure UTF-8 encoding, since some cultures don't want > unification, and it was decided that Emacs should not force > unification on those cultures.
Why can't you continue to use the MULE code and just change the character sets to reflect certain aspects of Unicode? One such aspect is Latin "unification", for example. (The Unicode people get very annoyed if you talk about "unification", "source separation rule" etc. in the context of non-Han scripts...) In a second step, support for normalization, combining characters etc. would have to be added, but this could be based on the reliable foundation of the old MULE code. - Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
