"H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does that mean you're painting yourself into a corner, though, > requiring manual work to integrate the increasingly Unicode-based > infrastructure support that is becoming available? Odds are pretty > good that they are.
I don't think it is a good idea to use operating system Unicode support. This would mean that GNU Emacs behaves differently on different operating systems, depending on the installed locale descriptions, for example. OTOH, the character encodings posted earlier to this list are as incompatible with existing Unicode support as the current emacs-mule internal encoding. In effect, just one Emacs-specific internal encoding is replaced by another. - Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
