On 28 Oct 2001, Dave Love wrote: > EZ> So we have two versions of Cyrillic characters, two versions of > EZ> Greek characters, two versions of Hebrew characters, etc.: one > EZ> version in the new Unicode set, the other version in the old Mule > EZ> set. > > There are more than two, at least for Greek and Cyrillic. Those in > the Far Eastern charsets could be unified too if anyone cared.
Full unification here would have the disadvantage that CJK Greek/Cyrillic characters are traditionally displayed as double-width, whereas ISO 8859/ISO 10646 Greek & Cyrillic characters are traditionally displayed single-width. Some CJK users might be quite happy about a lack of unification here to preserve the display width of these characters. Same for the block graphics characters, which xterm with ISO10646 fonts displays single-width whereas kterm with JIS/etc. fonts displays in double-width. But surely all the European encodings such as ISO 8859, KOI, etc. should be urgently unified with Unicode. The relevant standards have already been (re)written to represent these encodings just as single-byte encodings of ISO 10646 subsets. Markus -- Markus G. Kuhn, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK Email: mkuhn at acm.org, WWW: <http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/> - Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
