On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 11:10:17PM -0600, David Starner wrote:
> > I tend to prefer having features default to enabled if they're usable
> > by fully compliant clients--those with broken clients (even if they're
> > currently the majority) can disable it. 
> 
> Why do you think clients that can't display these quotes are broken? By
> the nature of the PC console, the Linux console (on the ix86, at least)
> can only display 512 different characters, 256 if you want bold
> characters. Conformant Unicode systems can support whatever set of
> characters they want. Give me a list of characters (< 256) that
> en_*.UTF-8 should support, and a consensus, then we can start
> claiming they're broken and fixing them.   

Because these characters have trivial fallbacks if they're not
available: β€œand ” to ", ’ to ' and β€˜ to `.

-- 
Glenn Maynard
--
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/

Reply via email to