>>>>> "Rich" == Rich Felker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rich> UTF-8. There's no good reason for using UTF-16 at all; it's
Rich> just a bad implementation choice. IIRC either HTML or XML
Rich> (yes I know they're different but I forget which does it..)
I don't ever recall seeing this in HTML, but it certainly isn't in
XML.
The only thing XML has to say on the subject is that XML parsers must
be able to read both.
--
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire
--
Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
