On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 13:44 -0700, enh wrote: > but given that our iw is your iw anyway... i don't understand the > situation in which they'd be inconvenienced here? >
But it's not. We can reasonably expect everyone who actually cares to have local modifications to iw that they aren't publishing (and that I wouldn't apply anyway since it'd be for vendor commands) - and they need to build *that* iw, not "our" iw. The fact that libwifihal more or less wants you to do vendor extensions makes that all the more likely, since if you want to test those with iw then you need a modified iw. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
