Hi, MsTiFtS is right, we're already been contacted by Bad Blox approx. 6 months ago. His firmware decryption method doesn't appear to work with our nano 2g and because we've got a lot of communication problems with him (he doesn't want to subscribe the list, etc) we've not been able to understand how he come to this method. About the iPhone, I wrote a bunch of mail about his encryption and the way it been hacked and we come to the fact that the nano2g use a different encryption method.
JD. https://mail.gna.org/public/linux4nano-dev/2007-09/msg00007.html On Jan 16, 2008 9:58 PM, MsTiFtS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Because the iPhone has much more (exploitable) functions, a much bigger > count of users (and hackers), and the possibility to install third-party > software on it (at least after a patch). > The core Linux4Nano team has approx. 5 members with 2 nanos and no real > hardware laboratory, I bet, that the hackers of the iPhone had much more > resources of these kinds. And probably a not that sophisticated > protection scheme, as they needed to implement a lot more functionality, > which broke it. > > wishmaster schrieb: > > > Hallo, > > > > Thanks for your answer... > > > > i searched the web, read ipolinux-sites, read linux4nano.org .... but i > > dont understand... > > > > why it is harder to decrypt nano 2G/3G firmaware then the firmeware of > > the iphone? > > > > MsTiFtS wrote: > > > >> Well, that's the old BadBlox crack, which only seems to work for iPods > >> older than Nano2G/Classic. We are still looking for a way to decrypt the > >> flash of our iPods, but we haven't yet found one. But I doubt that a > >> decrypted firmware will enable us to boot iPodLinux, for details, > >> please see the mailing list archive since 2007-12-30. You can usually > >> assume that we're informed about the iPodLinux articles, especially if > >> they were created 2007-03-30 and never touched again since 2007-04-03, > >> but supplying us with information is never such a bad idea, even though > >> I doubt that there still is relevant information on the web which we > >> haven't found yet. ;) > >> > >> The not that happy conclusion: No, the revolution is not (yet) going to > >> start... > >> > >> wishmaster schrieb: > >> > >> > >>> i dont know... maybe any developer could say it is useful for ipd nano > >>> 2G and 3G > >>> > >>> Bernhard Schuster wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> Does this mean the revolution is going to start right now? > >>>> -- > >>>> -Bernhard- > >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Linux4nano-dev mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev > >>>> http://www.linux4nano.org > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Linux4nano-dev mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev > >>> http://www.linux4nano.org > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Linux4nano-dev mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev > >> http://www.linux4nano.org > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux4nano-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev > > http://www.linux4nano.org > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux4nano-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev > http://www.linux4nano.org > _______________________________________________ Linux4nano-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev http://www.linux4nano.org
